O.C.G.A. § 40–6-391(a)(1)
(a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any moving vehicle while:
(1) Under the influence of alcohol to the extent that it is less safe to drive.
Elements of the charge:
The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:
- Person was driving or had actual physical control of the vehicle;
- Person was under the influence of alcohol (Mere presence of alcohol in blood is not enough, regardless of the level) (Circumstantial evidence that may be enough is appearance, odor, field sobriety, unsteady on feet, slurred speech); and
- Person was less safe to drive as a result of alcohol.
Notes:
When the State has no chemical (breath, blood, or urine) test results, proof of the other two elements (while under the influence of alcohol AND to the extent that it is less safe for the person to drive) may be seriously contested. William C. Head, The Georgia Trial Practice Manual, p. 7
Insufficient evidence of impairment
- I challenge at a pre-trial motion hearing, the arresting officer’s decision to make a custodial arrest for DUI.
- I challenge a required part of the prosecutor’s proof where the State of Georgia fails to bring in a qualified expert on alcohol metabolism to try to establish the driver’s alcohol level at the time of driving.
- No Probable Cause to Arrest
- I may sidetrack the State’s DUI case if I show that there was no probable cause for stopping this girl. See State v. Batty, 259 Ga.App. 431 (2003)